http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...96#post3661196
I maintain efficient it with some finer information.
Display fortitude no longer be any curse; and the throne of God and of the Pork fortitude be in it, and His bond-servants fortitude meeting Him; they fortitude see His envelop, and His name fortitude be on their foreheads (Seer 22:3, 4, NASB).
A. The Greek word for "meeting" is "latreuo".
B. Numerous that deny the Noble Jesus is God acclaim that latreuo is never rendered unto the Noble Jesus. It is due austerely to the Twitch. For example:
Calm down, in the New Testimonial the word latreuo refers to respect or service that is hands-on legitimately austerely to the Twitch (Acts 24:14)
http://elijahreturns.hubpages.com/hu...snt-God-Part-2
C. In a world of your own in the Address list of Seer we see that the Noble Jesus is the recipient of respect.
http://www.theologyweb.com/campus/sh...-of-Revelation
D. The mark out demonstrates that moreover God and the Pork (the Noble Jesus) earn latreuo in Seer 22:3.
1. His servants refers to moreover God (Seer 7:3) and the Pork (Seer 2:20).
2. His envelop refers to moreover God (Matthew 5:8) and the Pork (1 John 3:2).
3. His name on their foreheads refers to moreover God and the Pork (Seer 14:1).
4. Both God (Seer 22:5) and the Pork (Seer 21:23) fortitude give their servants light.
5. The administration of the angel is certified to moreover God (Seer 22:6) and the Pork (Seer 22:16).
6. The large day of rage that fortitude ensue the spiteful is certified to moreover God and the Pork (Seer 6:16-17 -> See Robertson beneath).
7. To power very of all the kingdoms is certified to moreover God and the Pork (Seer 11:15).
8. Is exhibit further flow in Seer that fortitude facts by its syntax that the Pork is personal referred to time was it reads "Him" in Seer 22:3? Seer 20:6 reads:...priests of God and of Christ and fortitude power with Him for a thousand get-up-and-go. According to verse 4 the "Him" of Seer 20:6 refers to the Pork. Seer 20:6 after that lets us know that the Pork is included as the recipient of latreuo in Seer 22:3.
E. Both dictionaries and commentaries arranged that moreover God and the Pork earn latreuo in this flow.
1. NIDNTT: One of the gifts of essential perfection is that the victors fortitude defend the name of the Pork (Rev. 3:12; 14:1; 22:4) (2:654, Entitlement, H. Bietenhard).
2. TDNT: The servants of God defend on their foreheads the shut up shop of God, the name of Christ and God. This protects them vs. divine divergence, vs. the apocalyptic plagues, Rev. 7:3; 9:4; 14:1; 22:4 (4:635, metwpon, Carl Schneider).
3. Vine: to God and Christ ( "the Pork" ), Seer 22:3 (Vine's Expository Lexicon of Old and New Testimonial Terminology, Liberate, page 1021).
4. Robertson: "Their" (autwn) progression the rage of God and of the Pork put covering on uniformity as in 22:3 (Robertson's Untruth Movie in the New Testimonial, Seer 6:17).
http://www.studylight.org/com/rwp/view.cgi?bk=65 cf. in the same way 11:15). That moreover are current on austerely one throne and together form one temple (21:22) enhances their supposed unity (The Address list of Seer, G.K. Beale, page 1113).
6. G.R. Beasley-Murray: But observe: his servants meeting him. Whose servants, and who is served? God, or the Pork, or God and the Lamb? It is daunting to interpret the submission in reference to the Pork individually, who is the point antecedent of his. Dreamy finer daunting is it to speak to to God individually. We prerequisite protection, appropriately, that the third deviation is correct: God and the Pork are viewed as a unity in so real a luxury that the intermittent pronoun individually is ready to interpret them (hint #1)
hint #1: So Holt, who observes that the vastly feature is appreciable in 11:15, 'The settle of the world has become the Maintain of our Noble and of his Christ, and he shall power for ever...' The unity is the dispute why the Christ is seated on the throne with God. 'The Christ stands in God's place, in the absence of thereby removing God himself to an distant distance; they friendly voguish a unity of get through. God's recess as Noble out of the world and Regent of the end time has at the vastly time become that of the Christ' (op. cit., pp. 202f) (The Address list of Seer, G.R. Beasley-Murray, page 332).
7. R.T. France:...not austerely is Jesus ('the Pork) mostly linked with God in His brilliance and rule (e.g. Rev. 7:14-17; 11:15; 12:10; 14:1, 4; 20:6; 21:22f.; 22:1-4) but respect and adore are vacant to Him for example with the Twitch (Rev. 1:5f.; 5:8-14; 7:9-12; 22:3).
F. For introduce somebody to an area who acclaim the Noble Jesus receives latreuo but this does not prove He is God:
1. The ministry denoted by latreuein is still vacant to God (or to heathen gods...R. 1:25...Ac. 7:42) (TDNT 4:62, latreuw, Strathmann).
2. in Biblical Greek still refers to the service of the true God or of heathen deities (The Expressions of the Greek Testimonial, James Desire Moulton and George Milligan, WM.B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., Dignified Rapids, Michigan, copyright 1982, page 371).
3. As cast-off in the New Testimonial, the word latreuo denotes engagements that are still evaluated luckily time was God is the grammatical piece and cynically with reference to any other piece (Karen H. Jobes in Moises Silva's "Biblical Terminology and Their Meaning: An Tradition to Lexical Semantics, copyright 1994 revised and expanded side from 1983, Zondervan Publishing Tend, Dignified Rapids, Michigan, page 203).
For introduce somebody to an area who declare that the Noble Jesus is not God why do you sustain to do so time was this flow proves your belief inwards Him to be in error?
