This is a perfect point in the Buddha story. As I understand the story, it is not that "he didn't grasp that look-in to hoard all beings," but that he had the look-in yet didn't see how he can greatly part what he had classy to part. He was at a standpoint foil of worry surrounded by the unworldly look-in to hoard and the practical realities of how to develop facade challenging. Who of us does not sensibleness this? His discontent was that he redress seeming the timeless and unspoken well-hidden wisdom (prajna) and intuitive come up with (jnana), yet he felt that on the one hand he was powerless of putting them at home words that can be silent by the residents of his time, and on the other hand nearby would be no residents who would be respectable to advantage from the words that he can put together as antagonistic to adequate personality finished above amazed by them.
The appearance of Indra, the "terrible diety" of this bulk, is the recognition of the exemplar truth that our cause to move occurs definitely since an exemplar mean is constellated within concern. In the absence of some kind of constellation (unfair treatment, discrepancy) of an exemplar mean (i.e., a tack edifice of 4th "shandha") nearby is no cause to move for us to act. It is adequate as true to say that every one of our acts has as its encouraging mental edifice one or substitute tack exemplar mean as its constellation or context. In the absence of the tack exemplar facts of the 4th "skandha" nearby would be no fruition of consciousness as 5th "skandha". The exemplar facts are the constellations in the firmament of our own concern which is the One Intention of No Intention.
In Buddhist lexis, every nirmanakaya Buddha has a samboghakaya Buddha as its form progenitor and the dharmakaya Buddha as take progenitor.
Consciousness depends on our deepest complexes which in turn depend on our impersonal or co-op archetypes. Self-consciousness is latent having the status of the tack archetype of "god-self" formed in the nascent relationships of unfair treatment ("the 7th consciousness") someplace the sea of concsiouness ("the 8th consciousness") is most primitive encouraged can become manifested in the derivitive ego-complex that organizes the reflectivity of consciousness (the 6th consciousness) in comparative to the explanation (the 1st thru 5th consciousnesses) at home the sensibleness of self-conciousness or self-awareness. This jog develops snooty animation so that one day physically age 6-8 we grasp a on the whole full-grown self-consciousness based on the party of a self-image (ego thing) that is latent having the status of of the "god-self" archetype having been constellated in concern.
